<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Behind OneRiot, better real-time Twitter search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.building43.com/videos/2009/09/29/behind-oneriot-better-real-time-twitter-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.building43.com/videos/2009/09/29/behind-oneriot-better-real-time-twitter-search/</link>
	<description>We&#039;re building43 - what are you building?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 03:01:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert J Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.building43.com/videos/2009/09/29/behind-oneriot-better-real-time-twitter-search/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert J Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.building43.com/?p=1582#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Love the meaningful real-time &amp; pulse search capabilities with OneRiot. Interesting point about the focus on Twitter versus Facebook for searching real-time conversations -- Twitter&#039;s stream is open, public (by default), but Facebook isn&#039;t. Surely Facebook would respond that it wants to own real-time search of its own users&#039; activity but the problem is Facebook isn&#039;t the whole web. I&#039;d rather use a service that incorporated all publicly available activity on the web rather than just one (hugely popular) service. At one time AOL owned most of the popular activity within it&#039;s borders but the openness of the Internet itself won out over the (hugely popular) closed system and the rest is history. In my opinion Facebook will lose the real-time race unless it opens up.

Of course, I&#039;m no analyst, just a geek who&#039;s watched this play out time and time again... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the meaningful real-time &amp; pulse search capabilities with OneRiot. Interesting point about the focus on Twitter versus Facebook for searching real-time conversations &#8212; Twitter&#8217;s stream is open, public (by default), but Facebook isn&#8217;t. Surely Facebook would respond that it wants to own real-time search of its own users&#8217; activity but the problem is Facebook isn&#8217;t the whole web. I&#8217;d rather use a service that incorporated all publicly available activity on the web rather than just one (hugely popular) service. At one time AOL owned most of the popular activity within it&#8217;s borders but the openness of the Internet itself won out over the (hugely popular) closed system and the rest is history. In my opinion Facebook will lose the real-time race unless it opens up.</p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;m no analyst, just a geek who&#8217;s watched this play out time and time again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
